National Safe Parents Organization
  • Home
  • The Problem & Solutions
  • Kayden's Law
  • Advocacy Community
  • Youth Advocacy
  • The Crisis
    • Claims of parental alienation >
      • VIDEO: The History of "Parental Alienation" - Part 1
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Press Release: March 17, 2023
    • Press Release: February 7, 2022
    • Press Release: March 16, 2022
    • The Debunked Concept of Parental Alienation
  • MEMBERS

‘I Believe You’: How JayDee Milo Became a Voice for Protective Moms Fighting America’s Dysfunctional Family Court System

6/23/2025

3 Comments

 
By Catherine Jones, NSPO Contributing Writer
PicturePhoto of JayDee Milo, and Jaydee with Sandi Milo, courtesy of Mr. Milo.





​To the untrained eye, JayDee Milo might not look like a champion of single mothers.  Known for his loud humor, outrageous wigs, and viral TikTok and Instagram rants, the influencer has built a brand that, at times, feels more like drag comedy than advocacy. But for his millions of followers (many who are mothers fighting for child custody, safety from an ex, or to just be believed),  JayDee is something rare. He's a man who listens, understands, and speaks their truth.

“I grew up with a single mom,” he says. “She went through abuse. Not just with my dad, but in other relationships. And no one helped her. When she passed away in 2011, I felt like her story died with her. This, what I’m doing now, is me keeping her story alive.”

And it’s resonating. By turning his personal grief into public purpose, JayDee (real name: James Somonski) has amassed a huge social following, over 1.6 million followers, to be exact, using a mix of satire and straight talk about the struggles of single moms and the family court crisis in America.

His videos are hilarious, yet heartbreaking, and they hit home every time. Often featuring exaggerated characters, wigs, and skits, each post is a virtual Trojan horse smuggling truth into the public discourse. But make no mistake: his message is deadly serious.

A Moral Issue, Not a Political One

“JayDee knows this isn’t a right or left issue,” says Dr. Kreslyn Barron Odum, a mother currently entangled in a family court nightmare of her own. “It’s a moral issue. It’s about standing for what’s right, for child safety. He’s choosing to speak when others remain silent, and I’m grateful for him.”

Odum has lost complete custody of her young daughter, Barron, without any warning. She has no criminal record, no history of abuse or neglect, and no explanation from the court for why her daughter was taken. And she is not alone. Protective mothers across the country say their concerns are routinely ignored or mischaracterized in family court. They are often dismissed as dramatic, hysterical, or vindictive when they raise safety concerns.
​
Kevin Robertson, a former Florida state prosecutor, criminal defense attorney, and victims’ rights attorney, explains: “I’ve spent 25 years in the justice system, and what I’ve seen, time and again, is that the system tends to minimize claims of abuse in family court. Warnings are brushed aside as ‘custody drama,’ and in some cases, the protective parent is painted as difficult or uncooperative, when in reality, they’re trying to save their child’s life.”

This is where a trend-setting social media influencer like JayDee, a self-proclaimed New Jersey native with a “loud mouth,” comes in.

 “Influencers like JayDee are giving people a platform, a voice, and a sense that they’re not alone in what they’re going through,” Robertson says, adding: “When an influencer, like JayDee, breaks it down in a way that’s real, accessible, and grounded in lived experience, it can be incredibly powerful. It helps people feel seen and educated, and in some cases, helps them avoid costly mistakes.”
 
Yet protective mothers are continuing to lose custody to their abusers. And others, like Kathy Sherlock in Pennsylvania, the mother of Kayden Mancuso, and Whitney Decker, in Washington State, the mother the Decker girls, have lost their children forever.

Whitney raised safety concerns and begged a custody judge for a psychological evaluation of her unstable homeless ex, but her girls were sent to spend time with him alone nevertheless. The result? The three young Decker girls were, according to law enforcement, murdered by their father during his custody time in a horrifying case that, tragically, could have been prevented.

Similarly, despite warnings raised by her mother in court, Kayden too was ordered to custody time with her dangerous father, and he killed her during his unsupervised custody time.

“Everybody says it’s so sad after the fact,” JayDee says. “But [these moms] begged. They were scared. They did everything right, tried everything they could. And still, nobody listened. Now those little girls will never breathe again. These are innocent kids who will never grow up. And they are just the tip of the iceberg.”

‘You Don’t Have to Justify Anything'

For his nearly two million followers, JayDee’s storytelling resonates not just because of his wit, but because of his empathy.

“Sometimes women just want to be heard,” he says. “They’ll tell me their story and I say, ‘I believe you.’ That’s it. That’s all they need to hear.”

Danielle Pollack co-founder of the National Safe Parents Organization (NSPO), which is the leading grassroots organization in the U.S. for family court reform, says JayDee’s impact can’t be overstated.

“When people think about family court, and a child getting abused or even killed by a dangerous parent who was given custody time, they want to look away and assume it’s an isolated event, but these problems are systemic court failures,” Pollack says. “By using comic relief, and taking jabs at what is sometimes an absurd system, JayDee helps his audience grasp that this stuff is real and widespread. He is reaching people who might otherwise stay in the dark about the courts and domestic abuse, and we are really appreciative of him for this. The more people understand the gravity of what is really going on in family courts, the sooner we can bring about key reforms which help protect at-risk kids and their safe parent.”

JayDee has become a bridge between private pain and public understanding. He gives voice to issues many dismiss or don’t really understand, like coercive control, financial abuse, trauma and its impacts, and the deeply flawed legal system that perpetuates them all when parents are litigating over custody.
 
“You know what’s wild?” he asks. “If a man abuses his wife, courts still say, ‘Well, he might still be a good dad.’ No! If you emotionally and physically abuse the mother of your child, that’s abuse of the child by extension. They’re watching. They’re absorbing it.”

It’s Not About Class or Education

One of the most dangerous misconceptions, JayDee says, is that this only happens to poor, uneducated women and children. He says Dr. Odum’s family court case in Georgia is the perfect example that family court abuses cut across class and are widespread and systemic.

“This affects everyone. Class, race, education level? Doesn’t matter,” he says flatly. “I talk to lawyers, doctors, highly educated women, women with their shit together, who are still dragged through court by abusive exes.”

He says he often shares DMs from mothers across the globe, women who thank him for making them laugh in the middle of custody nightmares. “It’s a double-edged sword,” he admits. “Every new follower I get? That’s another woman who's lived this. That’s heartbreaking.”

From Viral Videos to a National Movement

JayDee’s first viral post was a heartfelt video about his mom, Sandi Milo,  in 2011. “Millions reached out,” he recalls. “They said, ‘You told my story.’ That’s when I knew: this isn’t just my story. It’s ours.”

Through storytelling, advocacy, and yes, comedy, he’s become an unlikely linchpin in a growing national movement demanding change. And for organizations like the National Safe Parents Organization, his voice is invaluable.

“We need more people like JayDee speaking up,” Pollack says. “We need more people, especially more men, asking the hard questions. Why are judges ignoring clear red flags and granting dangerous parents unsafe custody time at the expense of kids? Why is coercive control treated like a non-issue in US custody courts? If a guy attacks and breaks his ex-wife’s arm, threatens to kill her, stalks her, kills the family pet in a rage, is he really a safe parent? Should he have custody of little children? Family courts keep saying yes. Why?”

JayDee is blunt: “Our system is broken. There’s no education for judges on coercive control. No understanding of how abuse works behind closed doors. And protective moms? They’re just trying to survive. They don’t even have time to go to the bathroom, let alone fight a legal battle.”

That same concern is echoed by Robertson, the Florida-based attorney who has represented protective parents. “Tragedies keep happening because the family court system often doesn’t take threats or warning signs seriously enough, especially when they come from a protective parent, usually the mother,” she says. “Courts often fall back on the idea that both parents are just bickering and should have equal access to the child, even when there are clear red flags.”

Action > Awareness

Despite the awareness he’s raised, JayDee says change must go beyond social media.

“I used to tell women: ‘You got this. You’re gonna win.’ But I stopped. Because the truth is—they might not. The courts often are not fair. It’s not a sprint; it’s a marathon. I don’t want to give false hope. But I do want them to feel seen.”

What’s next? JayDee wants to see stronger state laws, better training for judges, no quack theories that diminish abuse evidence, and nationwide implementation of protections like Kayden’s Law, which was passed by Congress and prioritizes child safety in custody cases.

Until then, he’ll keep doing what he does best: talking, listening, and turning trauma into truth.
“You’re supposed to love your child more than you hate your ex,” he says. “That’s what a good parent does. This isn’t about hating dads. It’s about protecting kids.”

And as he puts it plainly: “I’m just one person. But if one person speaking up helps one protective mom feel less alone? That’s enough reason to keep going.”

 

Picture
Photo of Barron and her mom, Dr. Kreslyn Barron Odum, courtesy of Dr. Odum.
3 Comments
Catherine Jones
6/23/2025 07:21:03 am

Thank you for taking the time to talk to me for this story, JayDee!

Reply
Cat Haith
9/19/2025 03:20:45 pm

why is he manplaining. We don't need that thanks, plenty of woman to do that for us. And a friend needs to tell him to stop extending his eyebrows with the dye..its not working..work with what you have son.

Reply
Anonymous
1/11/2026 10:51:41 pm

Thank you. Everything you said is true. I am going through this right now and I live in fear every single day that the family court will NOT listen to my evidence and end up giving custody or unsupervised time to my abusive ex.

He did not only abuse me, he abused our child starting when they were only a baby. He has a very aggressive temper. He would fly off the handle at the drop of a hat over tiny things. Several of his family members are just as unsafe.

With our child, he has spanked this child multiple times for doing age and developmentally appropriate things like wiggling during a diaper change. I have videos of this. I finally went to the police and was told this was not child abuse. A baby, a child under 3 getting spanked and screamed at was not child abuse. It should not matter if it left a mark or not - getting physical with a child under 4 should be IMMEDIATE child abuse. You are not reacting out of correction. You are reacting out of anger and lack of control. You ARE BEING ABUSIVE. You cannot possibly say that's appropriate for a child that young.

Animals have more rights than children in this country and that's sickening. If you spank or slap an animal, you're being charged with animal abuse/animal cruelty. But nothing happens if you do the same to a HUMAN CHILD just because "no marks were left" and "corporal punishment is legal in all 50 states"? Absolutely BS! In other, more civilized countries, you would immediately be arrested for being physical with ANY child because NO corporal punishment is legal.

If you slap another adult, you're charged with assault. Again - where are the rights for our CHILDREN?

Our child regularly got screamed at, cussed at and spanked. When I fought against it, I was yelled at, told what was happening was not abuse, threatened with court if I wanted to leave and told I was spoiling the child by catering to their cries.

The court has already given him supervised visits and it's been negatively impacting the child. They are terrified at every drop off. They have nightmares and other issues after a visit. It has dramatically increased their separation anxiety with me. They think I am leaving anytime they cannot see me. I have also heard conflicting stories from the supervisors.

We have been appointed a GAL by the court. During our first conversation when I expressed my concerns, the GAL bluntly told me that the court would not do supervised visits indefinitely and that if the supervised visits "went well" (according to supervisor notes) and the court had no concerns, they would move my ex to standard unsupervised visitation to the tune of every other weekend and a weekday evening. This GAL is a random stranger that does not know me, this child or my ex. This is a random stranger who I guarantee doesn't have proper training when handling child abuse or domestic violence. I am afraid this third party outsider is going to end up pushing the court to give my ex shared custody or at least standard unsupervised time. A random stranger should not be in control of making serious decisions involving child custody and parenting time when they are not even properly trained for complex situations involving abuse. GALs should not be allowed unless one of the parties requests it. The court system should be able to tell well enough on their own what the true best interest of the child(ren) is. They should have to be thoroughly trained to know about abuse and domestic violence and have training to recognize the signs. They shod have to undergo routine updated training as well.

Naturally, an abusive person is not going to do anything during a two hour supervised visit. They will save that until after the court gives them unsupervised visits. Abusers are great manipulators and actors. They are going to lie and win over the important people (judges, GALs, supervisors, etc) with fake charm and then expose their true colors once again when given custody or unsupervised time. Meanwhile, protective mothers like myself are deemed high-conflict, alienating or bitter. A family court should be able to see this plain as day and immediately shut down such abusers when they come into their court room. Anyone claiming "parental alienation" should automatically be flagged as this is one of the most common tactics used by abusers to flip the script and turn themselves into the victim. Parental alienation is widely debunked by professionals and should not be considered in family court.

As an unmarried mother in my state, I am automatically granted sole custody unless the father goes to court to try to change things. An abusive father like my ex should never stand a chance at changing the standard awarded custody. I should easily keep sole custody and he should not be allo to be alone with the child ever while the child is a minor, under 18.

I am terrified the court will end up giving my ex unsupervised visits or shared custody. I fear every day my child is going to become another preventable

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Custody
    Domestic Abuse
    Family Court
    Gag Order
    Kayden's Law
    Parental Alienation
    Reunification

    RSS Feed

Media Inquiries: [email protected]
Copyright ©2025 National Safe Parents Organization. All rights reserved.
  • Home
  • The Problem & Solutions
  • Kayden's Law
  • Advocacy Community
  • Youth Advocacy
  • The Crisis
    • Claims of parental alienation >
      • VIDEO: The History of "Parental Alienation" - Part 1
  • Articles
  • Media
    • Press Release: March 17, 2023
    • Press Release: February 7, 2022
    • Press Release: March 16, 2022
    • The Debunked Concept of Parental Alienation
  • MEMBERS